+1

Stuart
-914 886 2534

From: <[email protected]> on behalf of David McBride 
<[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 at 2:44 PM
To: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <[email protected]>
Cc: opnfv-project-leads <[email protected]>, TSC OPNFV 
<[email protected]>, Raymond Paik <[email protected]>, Tapio 
Tallgren <[email protected]>
Subject: [opnfv-project-leads] [release][euphrates] proposal to eliminate one 
of the two point releases for Euphrates

Team,

Please respond to this mail with (+1, 0, -1) and your thoughts, suggestions, or 
alternatives.

During the TSC call on Tues, Oct 3, the TSC agreed to slip the initial 
Euphrates release (5.0) to October 20.  In addition, I also proposed 
eliminating one of the two point releases (5.1, 5.2) planned for Euphrates.  
The reasoning was as follows:
1.      Moving the 5.0 release to Oct 20 places that release just 3 weeks 
before the planned release of 5.1 (Nov 10).
2.      Slipping 5.1 and 5.2 could have negative consequences for the OPNFV "F" 
release, as happened with Euphrates when we decided to slip Danube 3.0.
Therefore, the proposal is to eliminate the planned release on Nov 10, so that 
there would just be one point release on Dec 15.

The proposal is described in more detail in the slide deck that I presented 
during the TSC 
meeting<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_meetings_TSC-23TSC-2DOctober3-2C2017&d=DwMFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=iVavQx6gb7x-wiXKtJ7ryhHWVzNbV-FpJD1JlIhEm6s&m=JBdfEhGMM0WCv5CKfWJIrEIa0MKLgtRynWargCTz6Tw&s=IYjlQdcZQ8SxxZaSXbPb1gZpTshOTQ4rj1RO_L_lHco&e=>
 (see link labeled "euphrates contingency.pptx" under the heading "Euphrates 
update").

David

--
David McBride
Release Manager, OPNFV
Mobile: +1.805.276.8018<tel:%2B1.805.276.8018>
Email/Google Talk: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Skype: davidjmcbride1
IRC: dmcbride
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to