Yes, that’s specifically what I intend – i.e. not to duplicate rather leverage 
any existing work there. I recommend that at least one member of these projects 
attend the MANO WG meeting as a common place for us to discuss cross-project 
needs such as this. The biggest issue in OPNFV re this is that we have so many 
discrete meetings with little cross-project discussion. We are trying to 
address that in the MANO WG.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT&T

From: Christopher Price [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 8:44 AM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <[email protected]>; Ulas Kozat <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; Dimitri Mazmanov 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Support for multi-site development and testing

Hi Folks,

Why would this not be done in the multisite project?  
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/multisite/

They have already done a lot of work on multisite services and began testing in 
Colorado, they are limited in progress only by the number of resources engaged 
at the moment I think.  Rather than spin up a new initiative or wiki page in 
parallel to spread us even thinner I would suggest coordinating and driving our 
solutions in that project.

/ Chris

From: 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 on behalf of "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, 31 October 2016 at 16:27
To: Ulas Kozat <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Support for multi-site development and testing

In particular as discussed today on the Domino call:

-          What Pharos lab environments do you use for any multi-site testing

-          What multi-site-distributed VNF use cases have you worked on, and 
related aspects such as how you create the inter-VNF networking per VNF 
connection points

-          What if any “site agents” you are working on that aggregate 
site-related state etc and sync that with some multi-site “master” function 
(e.g. a global orchestrator or monitoring system)

These are all topics that are in scope for Domino to some degree.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT&T

From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ulas Kozat
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 7:19 AM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Support for multi-site development and testing

Hi everyone,

Is anyone in the community working towards a real multi-site development and 
testing environment?

I created a link under MANO WG 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/mano/Multi-Site+Support so that we can aggregate 
use cases from different projects in one place. Please pitch in.

It would be also interesting to learn how any of the existing OPNFV projects 
(e.g., multisite, IPv6, etc.) had circumvented their multi-site needs for 
testing and development.

Regards,

Ulas Kozat
Domino PTL
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to