>>the sudden deletion of our widely published openwrt.org email
addresses somewhat undermines this
Just so I am not jumping to wrong conclusions, their *.openwrt.org email
addresses were deleted in retaliation for forking OpenWrt? Seriously?
How did you not think that wasn't going to go well after all they have
done for OpenWrt?
--John
On 5/5/16 11:04 AM, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 5 May 2016 at 17:43, Daniel Dickinson <open...@daniel.thecshore.com> wrote:
On 16-05-05 05:34 AM, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 5 May 2016 at 06:48, Daniel Dickinson <open...@daniel.thecshore.com> wrote:
On 16-05-04 04:01 PM, mbm wrote:
Dear OpenWrt community,
[snip]
One simple question:
If LEDE team members are the ones who were suffering from some
non-democratic decisions, why didn't they bring it to public
discussion for community? At least on devel maillist?
If it was clear problem in remaining OpenWrt team then LEDE would win
the community right away or maybe problematic people would just go
away. Either way it would be more fair and open. And this is one of my
biggest concerns - LEDE team is promoting openness but didn't do their
moves openly (looking at maillists it seems they were hiding it for
month at least). Hate double standards.
Perhaps for fear of repercussions such as what has happened since the
fork where all LEDE members @openwrt.org email addresses have been deleted?
AFAIK, that was done after LEDE announcement but IMO was a wrong move anyway.
There are a number of people in the LEDE group I've found to be pretty
decent people, and great to work with, so I find it unlikely that they
simply acted without good reason.
This only add more shock to the announcement.
Regards,
Roman
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
