On 16-05-04 04:01 PM, mbm wrote: > Dear OpenWrt community, > > spin off the OpenWrt project in the first place as a way to fix the > project and its community. Also, the phrases such as a "reboot" are both > vague and misleading and the LEDE project failed to identify its true > nature. The LEDE announcement contains a number of very valid points
Can you be more specific about what you believe is LEDE's 'true nature'? > which we hoped we had an opportunity to discuss and attempt to fix, in a > public manner, before this more radical outcome. At this point, the > email as well as actions taken are very confusing to a lot of us. This is a guess: perhaps it is connected to the fact that Felix's n...@openwrt.org address now bounces, and that actions were taken which were deemed to be over-the-top by the LEDE team? Certainly there is a great deal more doing on that either side is saying in public (which might be just as well since there seems to be a fair amount of bad feelings on both sides). > We do acknowledge there has been internal disagreements, on several > occasions about some directions of the project, about the release model, > the lack of testing, the centralized infrastructure, however, there have > been actual work going on under the hoods to solve things one step at a Perhaps 'under-the-hood' is the problem. Did everyone with concerns know or have insight into what steps were currently being taken and what was planned, and have planned actions been followed through on, once *agreed* as a solution? Also, is the decision making process egalitarian and democratic amongst those still actively in the project, or are some 'more equal' than others? Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
