On 8/26/11 2:12 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On Friday 26 August 2011 07:14:07 Philip Prindeville wrote: >> On 8/25/11 9:18 AM, Jonas Gorski wrote: >>> [snip] >>> Hrm, I'm a bit confused about these patches: >>> >>> 1. Why are they in generic if they are actually x86-specific patches? >>> 2. Why are they only in patches-2.6.39, if the patches were accepted >>> in 3.2? 3.0 and 3.1 will need it, too. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jonas >> Well, since getting the x86 default kernel version bumped is next to >> impossible, porting it to higher versions seemed like a moot point. > Which is no longer true, since I applied your patch to get it bumped to > 2.6.39.4. As Jonas says, usually when you need a patch for 2.6.39 which is > not > in 3.0 nor in 3.1, just would need to provide 3 copies of it.
Hopefully someone noticed that I provided a 3.0 patch a few weeks ago, and it's still waiting on acceptance. This is one of the reasons I didn't submit 3 versions of the patch... it wasn't clear that they'd be accepted, so why invest the time and effort? -Philip _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
