On Friday 26 August 2011 07:14:07 Philip Prindeville wrote: > On 8/25/11 9:18 AM, Jonas Gorski wrote: > > On 25 August 2011 17:58, Philip Prindeville > > > > <philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote: > >> On 8/25/11 2:38 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >>> On Monday 22 August 2011 00:14:43 Philip Prindeville wrote: > >>>> Add support for Ed Wildgoose's alix platform driver plus my > >>>> enhancement to add GPIO soft button support. > >>>> > >>>> Redux: fix parameters for gpio_keys, add hotplug button script. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville <phil...@redfish-solutions.com> > >>> > >>> Applied both patches in r28081 since it did not really make sense to > >>> have them separated. > >>> > >>> I assumed that for maintenance reasons, you had both patches splitted, > >>> though patching a patch is usually not the right thing to do. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> The reason was I wanted to have the upstream files be separate from my > >> patch which isn't yet upstreamed. > > > > Hrm, I'm a bit confused about these patches: > > > > 1. Why are they in generic if they are actually x86-specific patches? > > 2. Why are they only in patches-2.6.39, if the patches were accepted > > in 3.2? 3.0 and 3.1 will need it, too. > > > > > > Regards, > > Jonas > > Well, since getting the x86 default kernel version bumped is next to > impossible, porting it to higher versions seemed like a moot point.
Which is no longer true, since I applied your patch to get it bumped to 2.6.39.4. As Jonas says, usually when you need a patch for 2.6.39 which is not in 3.0 nor in 3.1, just would need to provide 3 copies of it. -- Florian _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
