On 8/26/11 2:12 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On Friday 26 August 2011 07:14:07 Philip Prindeville wrote: >> On 8/25/11 9:18 AM, Jonas Gorski wrote: >>> On 25 August 2011 17:58, Philip Prindeville >>> >>> <philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/25/11 2:38 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>>>> On Monday 22 August 2011 00:14:43 Philip Prindeville wrote: >>>>>> Add support for Ed Wildgoose's alix platform driver plus my >>>>>> enhancement to add GPIO soft button support. >>>>>> >>>>>> Redux: fix parameters for gpio_keys, add hotplug button script. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville <phil...@redfish-solutions.com> >>>>> Applied both patches in r28081 since it did not really make sense to >>>>> have them separated. >>>>> >>>>> I assumed that for maintenance reasons, you had both patches splitted, >>>>> though patching a patch is usually not the right thing to do. >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> The reason was I wanted to have the upstream files be separate from my >>>> patch which isn't yet upstreamed. >>> Hrm, I'm a bit confused about these patches: >>> >>> 1. Why are they in generic if they are actually x86-specific patches? >>> 2. Why are they only in patches-2.6.39, if the patches were accepted >>> in 3.2? 3.0 and 3.1 will need it, too. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jonas >> Well, since getting the x86 default kernel version bumped is next to >> impossible, porting it to higher versions seemed like a moot point. > Which is no longer true, since I applied your patch to get it bumped to > 2.6.39.4. As Jonas says, usually when you need a patch for 2.6.39 which is > not > in 3.0 nor in 3.1, just would need to provide 3 copies of it.
I'll try to get that done this weekend. -Philip _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
