On 11/01/11 14:30, David Goodenough wrote: > OK, so does your code check to see if this is an M, or do we need to add that? > Do you think we should have two different drivers, one for the M the other for > the F and L, or can we interweave the code?
The detection and initialization part of the driver was already written, by Felix Fietkau. Since the M is a completely different chip than the F and L models, it only detects the M model, using the Chip Identification registers. I don't see any reason to interweave code for the M and the F. I see plenty of reason not to. They are wholly different. They deserve spearate drivers. Like I said, seems pretty much the only thing they have in common is part of the name of the chip. Peter. -- I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail. You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy. My key is available at http://wwwhome.cs.utwente.nl/~lebbing/pubkey.txt (new, larger key created on Nov 12, 2009) _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
