Hi Jason > Just to be clear, the GPL is not the only free software license. There > are > many, some of which have been reviewed at [1]. > > Just because something doesn't use the GPL, it doesn't automatically > follow that it's not free software. That's decided on whether the user > has > four specific freedoms [2]. > > I wonder if it would be better to instead include something that > indicates > whether it is (or is not) free software. > > [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html > [2] http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
... no doubt - you're totally right Our customers often requesting a GPL compliant SDK. They would like to get SDK's which could be published without any restrictions. I just would like to minimize the number of packages which have to be modified. In my opinion the GPLv2 would be a good choice. The attached file is dumping all the packages as csv table ==> the license information would be really important for our release process :-) br/R
lq_meta_info.pl
Description: lq_meta_info.pl
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
