The original thought behind the present model for submission of patches
was based on the existing procedure for kernel patch submission - it
looked like a model which worked, and by implementing it OpenWrt would
"teach" people a skill which could be needed later on.
The suggestions which have come until now are (just to list them):
* Keep things as they are.
* 'Ticket' based submission system.
* 'Ticket' based submission system with added notification to -devel.
* Launchpad (as new platform).
* (Did I forget something?).
I think it might be needed to make a distinction between submission of
patches targeted at packages, and patches targeted at the "base" system
itself?
It would be really good to extend the list of package maintainers, then
patches for packages could be send directly to the maintainer - or?
Chz
--
Gregers Petersen
People-stuff, layer 8 and anthropology
glp on irc
_______ ________ __
| |.-----.-----.-----.| | | |.----.| |_
| - || _ | -__| || | | || _|| _|
|_______|| __|_____|__|__||________||__| |____|
|__| W I R E L E S S F R E E D O M
KAMIKAZE (bleeding edge) -----------------------
* 10 oz Vodka Shake well with ice and strain
* 10 oz Triple sec mixture into 10 shot glasses.
* 10 oz lime juice Salute!
---------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
