On 10.12.2015 18:49, ValdikSS wrote:
I'd better go with just
closing the engine without deleting everything. I don't see any
drawbacks, that should be perfectly OK for a dynamic session.
Is this correct, Lev? If yes, I'll push v9 today or tomorrow morning.
Removing non-working FwpmSubLayerDeleteByKey0 call is indeed step into
right direction, rest is up to you :) I already mentioned above what I
would do.
Just for the record - this patch does not work on my only win10 box with
DNS leak - it blocks leaks but each DNS request takes 10 seconds, so I
cannot give an ACK. On the other hand, it works for others in this
discussion and is optional in any case (should not break things). So I
won't say NACK either.
-Lev
