Thanks Mike, works OK! Simple IP routing :)
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Gustavo Randich <gustavo.rand...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you, I'll test this approach and see... > > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Rick Jones <rick.jon...@hpe.com> wrote: > >> On 06/30/2016 10:32 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote: >> >>> No, those routers are routers. If one of them gets a packet, the router >>> will forward the packet as usual for a router. >>> >> > >> >>> You might think they don't handle connections into tenant networks, but >>> that might be because nothing is trying to use them as routers for the >>> tenant networks. That's a question about the routing tables in the rest >>> of your environment. >>> >>> If the client has a route to a Neutron tenant network that goes through >>> a Neutron router, the client is able to connect to a server on the >>> Neutron tenant network. >>> >>> The normal configuration for routers on the internet is to not forward >>> traffic to the RFC 1918 addresses. I do not recall how the Neutron >>> routers handle packets addressed to those addresses from sources on the >>> "outside". >>> >> >> For what it is worth, a quick test with some Mitaka-based bits, using >> 192.168.123.0/24 as the private network and ping suggests the neutron >> routers will be willing to forward the traffic just fine. >> >> That would be better than trying to do the same thing with instances as I >> proposed before. >> >> happy benchmarking, >> >> rick jones >> >> >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
