On Jun 30, 2016, at 7:04 PM, Rick Jones wrote: > For what it is worth, a quick test with some Mitaka-based bits, using > 192.168.123.0/24 as the private network and ping suggests the neutron routers > will be willing to forward the traffic just fine.
Is there anything specific you did to allow this? Because I accidental "tested" this myself yesterday. I have my external/physical network (192.168.69.0/24) with the GW/FW/NAT (192.168.69.1) that also do DHCP for that network. In my tenant network (10.0.0.0/16), when I created a VM, I choose this network as the primary/first network and then the tenant network as second. So when the VM booted, It got a 192.168.69.0/24 address! However, I could not reach it. And it could not reach anything else either. -- Turbo Fredriksson tu...@bayour.com _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
