Thank you, I'll test this approach and see...
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Rick Jones <rick.jon...@hpe.com> wrote: > On 06/30/2016 10:32 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote: > >> No, those routers are routers. If one of them gets a packet, the router >> will forward the packet as usual for a router. >> > > > >> You might think they don't handle connections into tenant networks, but >> that might be because nothing is trying to use them as routers for the >> tenant networks. That's a question about the routing tables in the rest >> of your environment. >> >> If the client has a route to a Neutron tenant network that goes through >> a Neutron router, the client is able to connect to a server on the >> Neutron tenant network. >> >> The normal configuration for routers on the internet is to not forward >> traffic to the RFC 1918 addresses. I do not recall how the Neutron >> routers handle packets addressed to those addresses from sources on the >> "outside". >> > > For what it is worth, a quick test with some Mitaka-based bits, using > 192.168.123.0/24 as the private network and ping suggests the neutron > routers will be willing to forward the traffic just fine. > > That would be better than trying to do the same thing with instances as I > proposed before. > > happy benchmarking, > > rick jones > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
