On 01/16/2017 10:31 AM, Rob C wrote:

I think the main point has already been hit on, developers don't want to
require that Barbican be deployed in order for their service to be
used.

I think that this is a perfectly reasonable stance for developers to take. As long as Barbican is an optional component, then making your service depend on it has a good chance of limiting your potential install base.

Given that, it seems like the ideal model from a security perspective would be to use Barbican if it's available at runtime, otherwise use something else...but that has development and maintenance costs.

Chris

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to