On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2016-11-04 15:42:17 +0000 (+0000), Paul Bourke wrote: >> We have no desire to do this, that's not what is being discussed >> here. On the contrary we're looking to reduce the barrier to entry >> for committers. Also the team is aware that cross project efforts >> should not be nit picked. > > That's what it seemed like to me up to this point in the thread as > well; I was specifically replying to Swapnil's suggestion that any > important change to Kolla deliverables should have a bug filed or > should continue to add a TrivialFix header in the commit message > otherwise. (And yes, as Andreas pointed out the other thread on the > related topic of mass changes for cross-project efforts does address > the case specifically, but becomes less necessary if you end up > agreeing to drop the TrivialFix requirement.) > -- > Jeremy Stanley > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Jeremy, I am sorry if I have miscommunicated earlier. I am referring to the situation where people are using TrivialFix just to get the changes in which is not good practice. I agree with removing TrivialFix just that we need to be very careful with changes that need tracking (e.g. bug/bp). __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
