Yes, I'm +1 for this. I've seen TrivialFix used for a lot of non-trivial fixes.
May be, we need a spec to define what is trivial? ;) Regards, Vikram Hosakote IRC: vhosakot From: Paul Bourke <paul.bou...@oracle.com<mailto:paul.bou...@oracle.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 6:51 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Propose removal of TrivialFix requirement Kolleagues, How do people feel above removing the requirement of having TrivialFix in commit messages where a bug/bp is not required? I'm seeing a lot of valid and important commits being held up because of this, in my opinion, unnecessary requirement. It also causes friction for new contributers to the project. Are there any major benefits we're getting from the use of this tag that I'm missing? Cheers, -Paul __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
