On 11/04/2016 04:25 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-11-04 18:18:49 +0530 (+0530), Swapnil Kulkarni wrote: >> I feel TrivialFix is consistently used by people just to avoid going >> to lanuchpad and filing a bug. It should only be used only if the "Fix >> is Trivial" >> This has been well documented in the contributing doc [1] and this >> should be referred to people when they do not have the bug/bp in the >> commit message. >> >> If the commits are important then there is no harm in creating a >> tracking bug for it. > [...] > > All I ask is that if the Kolla team wants to differentiate itself > from the review requirements of most OpenStack projects, please make > sure you have active and attentive liaisons who can update > mass-proposed changes for base infrastructure or other similar > horizonal and cross-project efforts to meet your special reviewing > standards. I cannot personally keep on top of the nuances of every > review team and individually adjust such mass changes myself, so > rely on you to "fix" my patches for me in such situations.
Jeremy, I do agree with your request. I expect this to be settled by Steven Dake's email: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-October/105287.html Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
