On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Loo, Ruby <ruby....@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In ironic, we have these ironic CLI commands:
> - ironic node-vendor-passthru (calls the specified passthru method)
> - ironic node-get-vendor-passthru-methods (lists the available passthru 
> methods)
>
> For their corresponding openstackclient plugin commands, we (I, I guess) have 
> proposed [1]:
> - openstack baremetal node passthrough call
> - openstack baremetal node passthrough list
>
> I did this because 'passthrough' is more English than 'passthru' and I 
> thought that was the 'way to go' in osc. But some folks wanted it to be 
> 'passthru' because in ironic, we've been calling them 'passthru' since day 2. 
> To make everyone happy, I also proposed (as aliases):
>
> - openstack baremetal node passthru call
> - openstack baremetal node passthru list
>
> Unfortunately, I wasn't able to make everyone happy because someone else 
> thinks that we shouldn't be providing two different openstack commands that 
> provide the same functionality. (They're fine with either one, just not both.)
>

I also don't like having two commands for the same functionality, it
sounds wrong to me. I think we should deprecate one of the two.

I don't have a strong opinion of which one we should deprecate but I
slightly prefer "passthru" because that's how we call it in the API.

Cheers,
Lucas

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to