Hi,

In ironic, we have these ironic CLI commands:
- ironic node-vendor-passthru (calls the specified passthru method)
- ironic node-get-vendor-passthru-methods (lists the available passthru methods)

For their corresponding openstackclient plugin commands, we (I, I guess) have 
proposed [1]:
- openstack baremetal node passthrough call
- openstack baremetal node passthrough list

I did this because 'passthrough' is more English than 'passthru' and I thought 
that was the 'way to go' in osc. But some folks wanted it to be 'passthru' 
because in ironic, we've been calling them 'passthru' since day 2. To make 
everyone happy, I also proposed (as aliases):

- openstack baremetal node passthru call
- openstack baremetal node passthru list

Unfortunately, I wasn't able to make everyone happy because someone else thinks 
that we shouldn't be providing two different openstack commands that provide 
the same functionality. (They're fine with either one, just not both.)

What do the rest of the folks think? Some guidance from the OpenStackClient 
folks would be greatly appreciated.

--ruby


[1] 
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/specs/approved/ironicclient-osc-plugin.html




__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to