On Apr 9, 2016 11:51 AM, Tom Fifield <[email protected]> wrote: > The standing issue that I recall that raises the maintenance burden is > the use of debconf rather than/in addition to manual config file edits > as per the other distros. I can't remember whether you already tried a > version without debconf or not though.
Debconf is the standard interface for configuring packages. It should be what we document, as it is what is going to be in action for Debian users. There is no "standing issue", just the opinion of Matthew. Trying to transform his opinion as an established fact doesn't work, I'm sorry. On Apr 9, 2016 11:51 AM, Tom Fifield <[email protected]> wrote: On 09/04/16 14:49, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I still don't have any idea what's wrong with the > Debian guide. The standing issue that I recall that raises the maintenance burden is the use of debconf rather than/in addition to manual config file edits as per the other distros. I can't remember whether you already tried a version without debconf or not though. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
