Excerpts from Sean M. Collins's message of 2016-02-16 07:15:34 +0000: > Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Oh, that, and ... not using CassandraDB. And yes, this thread is a good > > place to have this topic. I'm not sure who replied to me this thread > > wasn't the place to discuss it: I respectfully disagree, since it's > > another major blocker, IMO as important, if not more, as using a free > > software CDN solution. > > Let's handle the policy implications discussed in this thread before we > dive into the "don't use this component that I dislike" bikeshed. > Reading the thread, it appears that we've made good progress on building > consensus towards having Poppy consider an open source CDN as the > "reference implementation" (to use some Neutron parlance). > > Then we can bikeshed about how good/bad the components used in the > reference implementation are. Later. The point being, there is an open > source solution that will be used to flesh out a true vendor-neutral API > (as I understand Mike Perez's position, and agree with!).
Is there? I thought the point was OpenCDN isn't actually usable. Maybe someone from the Poppy team can provide more details about that. Doug __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
