On 11/02/16 17:31 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 02/08/2016 09:54 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:Would our votes change if Poppy had support for OpenCDN (imagine it's being maintained) even if that solution is terrible?Let's say it was doing that, and spawning instances containing OpenCDN running on a multi-datacenter OpenStack deployment, then IMO it would be a good candidate.
This might be an overkill for cloud admins and there'll be close to no clouds running their own CDN.
Oh, that, and ... not using CassandraDB. And yes, this thread is a good place to have this topic. I'm not sure who replied to me this thread wasn't the place to discuss it: I respectfully disagree, since it's another major blocker, IMO as important, if not more, as using a free software CDN solution.
It was me and I disagree. This thread is to talk about the *open core* issue. In fact, the first email didn't even call out Poppy to begin with. For all the remaining issues there's a spec in the governance repo that can be used. Also, this topic was discussed in the latest TC meeting. Flavio -- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
