On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote:
[snip] > Fifth - if we do this, the real need for the mid-cycles we currently have > probably goes away since the summit week can be a legit wall-to-wall work > week. > [snip] Another reply to a specific point... I disagree strongly here, at least in the Nova case. I feel Nova has been getting along much better and generally pulling in the same direction for the last few releases. I think one of the things we did to get there is the mid-cycles, which gave us more time to sync on the overall direction of Nova, as well as ensuring we start being honest at this point in the release cycle about what we're going to get done before we ship. For Nova at least its really important to have an approximately milestone 2 check point where we can decide what to defer and what to focus on. Otherwise we end up back in a place where we release a mish mash of half finished features. Michael -- Rackspace Australia
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
