On 12/04/2015 03:33 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04 2015, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
Specifically, I'm talking about ironic-inspector, which is a auxiliary service
under the bare metal program. My first assumption is to prefix with ironic's
official name, so it should be something like 'baremetal-XXX' or 'baremetal
XXX'. Is it correct? Which separator is preferred?
FWIW we have 3 different projects under the telemetry umbrella and they
do not share any prefix.
Do you register all 3 in keystone? What do you use as service types?
Next step is choosing the XXX part. The process we implement in
ironic-inspector is usually referred to as "baremetal introspection" or
"baremetal inspection". The former is used for our OSC plugin, so I think our
official name should be one of
1. "baremetal<SEPARATOR>introspection" - named after the process we implement
2. "baremetal<SEPARATOR>inspector" - using our code name after the official
ironic project name.
I think 1. makes more sense.
That's what I'll use if nobody objects.. I'm only undecided about the
separator.
My 2c,
Cheers,
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
