Hi everyone!
I'd like to get guidance on how to pick an official name (e.g. appearing
in keystone catalog or used in API versioning headers) for a subproject
of an official project.
Specifically, I'm talking about ironic-inspector, which is a auxiliary
service under the bare metal program. My first assumption is to prefix
with ironic's official name, so it should be something like
'baremetal-XXX' or 'baremetal XXX'. Is it correct? Which separator is
preferred?
Next step is choosing the XXX part. The process we implement in
ironic-inspector is usually referred to as "baremetal introspection" or
"baremetal inspection". The former is used for our OSC plugin, so I
think our official name should be one of
1. "baremetal<SEPARATOR>introspection" - named after the process we
implement
2. "baremetal<SEPARATOR>inspector" - using our code name after the
official ironic project name.
WDYT? Any suggestions are welcome.
Dmitry
P.S.
This topic was raised by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/253493/ but
also appeared in the microversioning discussion.
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
