On Fri, Dec 04 2015, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Specifically, I'm talking about ironic-inspector, which is a auxiliary service > under the bare metal program. My first assumption is to prefix with ironic's > official name, so it should be something like 'baremetal-XXX' or 'baremetal > XXX'. Is it correct? Which separator is preferred?
FWIW we have 3 different projects under the telemetry umbrella and they do not share any prefix. > Next step is choosing the XXX part. The process we implement in > ironic-inspector is usually referred to as "baremetal introspection" or > "baremetal inspection". The former is used for our OSC plugin, so I think our > official name should be one of > 1. "baremetal<SEPARATOR>introspection" - named after the process we implement > 2. "baremetal<SEPARATOR>inspector" - using our code name after the official > ironic project name. I think 1. makes more sense. My 2c, Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // Free Software hacker // https://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
