On 11/05/2015 03:08 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Robert Collins wrote: > >> In the session we were told that zookeeper is already used in CI jobs >> for ceilometer (was this wrong?) and thats why we figured it made a >> sane default for devstack. > > For clarity: What ceilometer (actually gnocchi) is doing is using tooz > in CI (gate-ceilometer-dsvm-integration). And for now it is using > redis as that was "simple". > > Outside of CI it is possible to deploy ceilo, aodh and gnocchi to use > tooz for coordinating group partitioning in active-active HA setups > and shared locks. Again the standard deploy for that has been to use > redis because of availability. It's fairly understood that zookeeper > would be more correct but there are packaging concerns.
What are the packaging concerns for zookeeper? -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev