Graham, Agree. Hence the Tooz as the abstraction layer. Folks are welcome to write new drivers or fix existing drivers for Tooz where needed.
-- Dims On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Hayes, Graham <graham.ha...@hpe.com> wrote: > On 04/11/15 20:04, Ed Leafe wrote: >> On Nov 3, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Here's a Devstack review for zookeeper in support of this initiative: >>> >>> https://review.openstack.org/241040 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Dims >> >> I thought that the operators at that session made it very clear that they >> would *not* run any Java applications, and that if OpenStack required a Java >> app to run, they would no longer use it. >> >> I like the idea of using Zookeeper as the DLM, but I don't think it should >> be set up as a default, even for devstack, given the vehement opposition >> expressed. >> >> >> -- Ed Leafe >> > > I got the impression that there was *some* operators that wouldn't run > java. > > I do not see an issue with having ZooKeeper as the default, as long as > there is an alternate solution that also works for the operators that do > not want to use it. > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
