Good work on the documentation, it's something that will really help
new neutron developers.
On 03/07/2014 07:44 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
Hi Carl,
I really appreciate you for writing this up!
I have no hurdle to remove my -1 for the review.
I just thought it is an item easy to fix.
It is a great start line towards useufl developer documentation.
Thanks,
Akihiro
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Collins, Sean
<sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
Hi,
I know everyone is very busy working on the I-3 release, but I wanted
solicit feedback on my developer documentation review.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72428/
Currently, we have a couple +1's and a +2 from Nachi - Akihirio Motoki
and Henry Gessau brought up valid points about the TESTING file, but I
felt that they can be addressed in other patchsets - since I don't feel
confident in making the changes that they suggested, and some of the
comments refer to issues that exist in the
In addition, we're almost to the goal line - I'd rather get some docs
merged and update in another patchset, rather than update this review
with another patchset, that clears out all the +2's and +1's and then
wait for everyone to circle back and re-approve.
I understand this is a unusual request and I am asking for special
treatment, but Neutron is severely lacking in documentation for new
developers and I think this patch moves us closer to fixing it.
Thoughts?
--
Sean M. Collins
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
