I agree this is a valid request. As a team we should consider this special request and help is possible. Specially on Documentation!! :-)
Edgar On 3/7/14 10:12 AM, "Collins, Sean" <sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: >Hi, > >I know everyone is very busy working on the I-3 release, but I wanted >solicit feedback on my developer documentation review. > >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72428/ > >Currently, we have a couple +1's and a +2 from Nachi - Akihirio Motoki >and Henry Gessau brought up valid points about the TESTING file, but I >felt that they can be addressed in other patchsets - since I don't feel >confident in making the changes that they suggested, and some of the >comments refer to issues that exist in the > >In addition, we're almost to the goal line - I'd rather get some docs >merged and update in another patchset, rather than update this review >with another patchset, that clears out all the +2's and +1's and then >wait for everyone to circle back and re-approve. > >I understand this is a unusual request and I am asking for special >treatment, but Neutron is severely lacking in documentation for new >developers and I think this patch moves us closer to fixing it. > >Thoughts? > >-- >Sean M. Collins >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-dev mailing list >OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
