Hi Carl, I really appreciate you for writing this up! I have no hurdle to remove my -1 for the review. I just thought it is an item easy to fix.
It is a great start line towards useufl developer documentation. Thanks, Akihiro On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Collins, Sean <sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I know everyone is very busy working on the I-3 release, but I wanted > solicit feedback on my developer documentation review. > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72428/ > > Currently, we have a couple +1's and a +2 from Nachi - Akihirio Motoki > and Henry Gessau brought up valid points about the TESTING file, but I > felt that they can be addressed in other patchsets - since I don't feel > confident in making the changes that they suggested, and some of the > comments refer to issues that exist in the > > In addition, we're almost to the goal line - I'd rather get some docs > merged and update in another patchset, rather than update this review > with another patchset, that clears out all the +2's and +1's and then > wait for everyone to circle back and re-approve. > > I understand this is a unusual request and I am asking for special > treatment, but Neutron is severely lacking in documentation for new > developers and I think this patch moves us closer to fixing it. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Sean M. Collins > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
