Hi Matthew, I¹m interested to help in this switch to python logging framework for shipping to logstash/etc. Are you working on a blueprint for this? Cheers,
Cristian On 27/01/14 11:07, "Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew" <matthew.macdonald-wall...@hp.com> wrote: >Hi Sean, > >I'm currently working on moving away from the "built-in" logging to use >log_config=<filename> and the python logging framework so that we can >start shipping to logstash/sentry/<insert other useful tool here>. > >I'd be very interested in getting involved in this, especially from a >"why do we have log messages that are split across multiple lines" >perspective! > >Cheers, > >Matt > >P.S. FWIW, I'd also welcome details on what the "Audit" level gives us >that the others don't... :) > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] >> Sent: 27 January 2014 13:08 >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List >> Subject: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards >> >> Back at the beginning of the cycle, I pushed for the idea of doing some >>log >> harmonization, so that the OpenStack logs, across services, made sense. >>I've >> pushed a proposed changes to Nova and Keystone over the past couple of >>days. >> >> This is going to be a long process, so right now I want to just focus >>on making >> INFO level sane, because as someone that spends a lot of time staring >>at logs in >> test failures, I can tell you it currently isn't. >> >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LoggingStandards is a few things I've >>written >> down so far, comments welcomed. >> >> We kind of need to solve this set of recommendations once and for all >>up front, >> because negotiating each change, with each project, isn't going to work >>(e.g - >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69218/) >> >> What I'd like to find out now: >> >> 1) who's interested in this topic? >> 2) who's interested in helping flesh out the guidelines for various log >>levels? >> 3) who's interested in helping get these kinds of patches into various >>projects in >> OpenStack? >> 4) which projects are interested in participating (i.e. interested in >>prioritizing >> landing these kinds of UX improvements) >> >> This is going to be progressive and iterative. And will require lots of >>folks >> involved. >> >> -Sean >> >> -- >> Sean Dague >> Samsung Research America >> s...@dague.net / sean.da...@samsung.com >> http://dague.net > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-dev mailing list >OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
