Hi Sean, it's great that you're catching this up.
I'd like to participate. I don't know how much time I'll be able to dedicate on it, but at least I'm ready for reviews and pushing it to Savanna. Thanks! On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > On 01/27/2014 09:57 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net > > <mailto:s...@dague.net>> wrote: > > > > On 01/27/2014 09:07 AM, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote: > > > Hi Sean, > > > > > > I'm currently working on moving away from the "built-in" logging > > to use log_config=<filename> and the python logging framework so > > that we can start shipping to logstash/sentry/<insert other useful > > tool here>. > > > > > > I'd be very interested in getting involved in this, especially > > from a "why do we have log messages that are split across multiple > > lines" perspective! > > > > Do we have many that aren't either DEBUG or TRACE? I thought we were > > pretty clean there. > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > P.S. FWIW, I'd also welcome details on what the "Audit" level > > gives us that the others don't... :) > > > > Well as far as I can tell the AUDIT level was a prior drive by > > contribution that's not being actively maintained. Honestly, I think > we > > should probably rip it out, because I don't see any in tree tooling > to > > use it, and it's horribly inconsistent. > > > > > > For the uses I've seen of it in the nova api code INFO would be > > perfectly fine in place of AUDIT. > > > > I'd be happy to help out with patches to cleanup the logging in n-api. > > > > One other thing to look at - I've noticed with logs is that when > > something like glanceclient code (just as an example) is called from > nova, > > we can get ERROR level messages for say image not found when its > > actually perfectly expected that this will occur. > > I'm not sure if we should be changing the error level in glanceclient or > > just forcing any error logging in glanceclient when > > called from Nova to a lower level though. > > It's now changed in glanceclient - > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67744/ - it should be gone in the gate > logs, and will be gone for everyone once a new release is out. > > -Sean > > -- > Sean Dague > Samsung Research America > s...@dague.net / sean.da...@samsung.com > http://dague.net > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Sincerely yours, Sergey Lukjanov Savanna Technical Lead Mirantis Inc.
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev