On Jan 16, 2014, at 4:06 PM, Jesse Noller <jesse.nol...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 16, 2014, at 2:22 PM, Renat Akhmerov <rakhme...@mirantis.com> wrote: > >> Since it’s pretty easy to get lost among all the opinions I’d like to >> clarify/ask a couple of things: >> >> Keeping all the clients physically separate/combining them in to a single >> library. Two things here: >> In case of combining them, what exact project are we considering? If this >> list is limited to core projects like nova and keystone what policy could we >> have for other projects to join this list? (Incubation, graduation, >> something else?) >> In terms of granularity and easiness of development I’m for keeping them >> separate but have them use the same boilerplate code, basically we need a >> OpenStack Rest Client Framework which is flexible enough to address all the >> needs in an abstract domain agnostic manner. I would assume that combining >> them would be an additional organizational burden that every stakeholder >> would have to deal with. > > Keeping them separate is awesome for *us* but really, really, really sucks > for users trying to use the system. I agree. Keeping them separate trades user usability for developer usability, I think user usability is a better thing to strive for. > >> Has anyone ever considered an idea of generating a fully functional REST >> client automatically based on an API specification (WADL could be used for >> that)? Not sure how convenient it would be, it really depends on a >> particular implementation, but as an idea it could be at least thought of. >> Sounds a little bit crazy though, I recognize it :). >> >> Renat Akhmerov >> >> On 16 Jan 2014, at 11:52, Chmouel Boudjnah <chmo...@enovance.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 16, 2014, at 2:36 PM, Joe Gordon <joe.gord...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> 2) major overhaul of client libraries so they are all based off a common >>>> base library. This would cover namespace changes, and possible a push to >>>> move CLI into python-openstackclient >>> This seems like the biggest win to me. >>> >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Chmouel. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
