On 15/01/14 11:28 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Sergey Lukjanov wrote:I think that in case of adding additional meeting rooms, we'll need to avoid disparity between them in names. For example, currently we have a lot of folks in #os-meeting and not so many in #os-meeting-alt, if we'll have #os-meeting-alt-2 then we'll have even less folks there and it'll be the same like making meeting in project channel.So, probably it'll be better to have meeting rooms named #openstack-meeting-1(or -a?) and etc. and round robin meetings between this channels.The trick is... renaming channels is hard, especially when 300 people lurk in one and have their setups pointing to them. I'm not sure the value of averaging lurking across meeting rooms outweighs the inconvenience renaming creates for existing users. There are already conflicts as people pick times that appear to be free but are actually used every other week... so a third room is definitely wanted. We can go and create #openstack-meeting3 (other suggestions welcome) and then discuss a consistent naming scheme and/or if renaming is such a good idea.
-meeting3 sounds good to me!
-- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco
pgpHwpUyOGdp1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
