I think that in case of adding additional meeting rooms, we'll need to avoid disparity between them in names. For example, currently we have a lot of folks in #os-meeting and not so many in #os-meeting-alt, if we'll have #os-meeting-alt-2 then we'll have even less folks there and it'll be the same like making meeting in project channel.
So, probably it'll be better to have meeting rooms named #openstack-meeting-1(or -a?) and etc. and round robin meetings between this channels. On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Thierry Carrez <[email protected]>wrote: > Matthias Runge wrote: > > On 01/13/2014 09:33 PM, Lyle, David wrote: > >> With all the warranted meeting time shuffling that has been happening > >> recently, and the addition of so many projects and sub-teams, the > >> meeting calendar for #openstack-meeting and #openstack-meeting-alt > >> [1] is relatively full. So recently, when trying to move the Horizon > >> meeting time, the poll determined slot is unavailable. > >> > >> Should we run logged meetings from individual team rooms like > >> #openstack-horizon? The advantage is it's available. The downside is > >> that less people from other team linger in #openstack-horizon than > >> #openstack-meeting. > >> > >> Should another meeting room be added? This solution only scales so > >> far. > > Yes, if we have anything in masses, then it should be meeting rooms on > IRC. > > > > The only issue I could see here is: if folks want to participate, and > > meetings times overlap, they will have divide their attention. > > Yes, that's actually the main reason why we try to stick with meeting > channels and add more of them only when congestion happens: to encourage > spreading the meetings, and avoiding double-booking people on a few > "best" slots. > > The other benefit of sticking to meeting channels (vs. using team > channels for meetings) is that it's easier to lurk on a few channels to > get highlights during meetings, than to try to find all channels where > meetings may happen (and keep the list current). > > So the trick is the balance between encouraging spreading meetings and > starting to be a pain :) Meeting slots between 14:00 and 21:00 UTC are > pretty busy from Tuesday to Thursday. So it might indeed be the time to > add a new meeting room. > > #openstack-meeting-alt2 ? or is it also time to find a naming scheme for > our meeting rooms ? > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Sincerely yours, Sergey Lukjanov Savanna Technical Lead Mirantis Inc.
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
