Matthias Runge wrote: > On 01/13/2014 09:33 PM, Lyle, David wrote: >> With all the warranted meeting time shuffling that has been happening >> recently, and the addition of so many projects and sub-teams, the >> meeting calendar for #openstack-meeting and #openstack-meeting-alt >> [1] is relatively full. So recently, when trying to move the Horizon >> meeting time, the poll determined slot is unavailable. >> >> Should we run logged meetings from individual team rooms like >> #openstack-horizon? The advantage is it's available. The downside is >> that less people from other team linger in #openstack-horizon than >> #openstack-meeting. >> >> Should another meeting room be added? This solution only scales so >> far. > Yes, if we have anything in masses, then it should be meeting rooms on IRC. > > The only issue I could see here is: if folks want to participate, and > meetings times overlap, they will have divide their attention.
Yes, that's actually the main reason why we try to stick with meeting channels and add more of them only when congestion happens: to encourage spreading the meetings, and avoiding double-booking people on a few "best" slots. The other benefit of sticking to meeting channels (vs. using team channels for meetings) is that it's easier to lurk on a few channels to get highlights during meetings, than to try to find all channels where meetings may happen (and keep the list current). So the trick is the balance between encouraging spreading meetings and starting to be a pain :) Meeting slots between 14:00 and 21:00 UTC are pretty busy from Tuesday to Thursday. So it might indeed be the time to add a new meeting room. #openstack-meeting-alt2 ? or is it also time to find a naming scheme for our meeting rooms ? -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
