On 3 January 2014 00:53, Day, Phil <philip....@hp.com> wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > Thanks for a great summary. > > I don't really share your view that there is a "us vs them" attitude emerging > between operators and developers (but as someone with a foot in both camps > maybe I'm just thinking that because otherwise I'd become even more bi-polar > :-) > > I would suggest though that the criteria for core reviewers is maybe more > slanted towards developers that operators, and that it would be worth > considering if there is some way to recognised and incorporate the different > perspective that operators can provide into the review process.
Perhaps they can start doing reviews? One could argue that a specific venue is needed for them to review effectively, as looking at each individual commit being proposed might not be efficient for folk looking at conceptual review - but thats at best a hypothesis. If ops focused folk spent an hour a day reviewing upcoming changes I'm fairly certain they would both be listened to and eventually earn core wings. -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
