On 8/17/2018 12:30 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
I know politics will be involved in this, but this is a really terrible reason to do a thing, IMHO. After the most recent meeting we had with the Cinder people on placement adoption, I'm about as convinced as ever that Cinder won't (and won't need to)_consume_ placement any time soon. I hope it will_report_ to placement so Nova can make better decisions, just like Neutron does now, but I think that's the extent we're likely to see if we're honest.
[1] is a concrete example of where cinder would benefit from using placement to avoid scheduling conflicts, which was one of the primary reasons it was developed for nova as well.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/559718/ -- Thanks, Matt __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
