On 2 July 2013 21:32, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > Thierry Carrez wrote: >> """ >> 'OpenStack Programs' are efforts which are essential to the completion >> of our mission. Programs can create any code repository and produce any >> deliverable they deem necessary to achieve their goals. >> >> Programs are placed under the oversight of the Technical Committee, and >> contributing to one of their code repositories grants you ATC status. >> >> Current efforts or teams which want to be recognized as an 'OpenStack >> Program' should place a request to the Technical Committee, including a >> clear mission statement describing how they help the OpenStack general >> mission and how that effort is essential to the completion of our >> mission. If programs have a goal that includes the production of >> a server 'integrated' deliverable, that specific project would still >> need to go through an Incubation period. >> >> The initial Programs are 'Nova', 'Swift', 'Cinder', 'Neutron', >> 'Horizon', 'Glance', 'Keystone', 'Heat', 'Ceilometer', 'Documentation', >> 'Infrastructure', 'QA' and 'Oslo'. 'Trove' and 'Ironic' are in >> incubation. Those programs should retroactively submit a mission >> statement and initial lead designation, if they don't have one already. >> """ > > Oops. In this variant, Trove and Ironic, as programs, would not be "in > incubation" (only one of their deliverables would). That last paragraph > should be fixed as: > > """ > The initial Programs are 'Nova', 'Swift', 'Cinder', 'Neutron', > 'Horizon', 'Glance', 'Keystone', 'Heat', 'Ceilometer', 'Documentation', > 'Infrastructure', 'QA', 'Oslo', 'Trove' and 'Ironic'. Those programs > should retroactively submit a mission statement and initial lead > designation, if they don't have one already. > """ > > Maybe Ironic should be merged into the TripleO program when it's considered.
Certainly; with our focus on deploy and operations, Ironic is very much something we'll care about forever :). OTOH, baremetal machine provisioning is a distinct concern from OpenStack deployment and operations. I don't know that there is a better place for Ironic; it's certainly got significant tentacles into other areas than just Nova [hence it being split out in the first place]. Nevertheless : clearly Ironic is a Project, and Incubated. I think whether it is incorporated into it's own Program, or TripleO, isn't a very interesting question. ATC membership is decoupled from things now, so \o/. On proposal 3, I wonder if it makes things too vague : if a Program can have one or more integrated Projects, it sort of suggests that perhaps Neutron be a Project of the Nova Program? -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Cloud Services _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
