Thierry Carrez wrote: > """ > 'OpenStack Programs' are efforts which are essential to the completion > of our mission. Programs can create any code repository and produce any > deliverable they deem necessary to achieve their goals. > > Programs are placed under the oversight of the Technical Committee, and > contributing to one of their code repositories grants you ATC status. > > Current efforts or teams which want to be recognized as an 'OpenStack > Program' should place a request to the Technical Committee, including a > clear mission statement describing how they help the OpenStack general > mission and how that effort is essential to the completion of our > mission. If programs have a goal that includes the production of > a server 'integrated' deliverable, that specific project would still > need to go through an Incubation period. > > The initial Programs are 'Nova', 'Swift', 'Cinder', 'Neutron', > 'Horizon', 'Glance', 'Keystone', 'Heat', 'Ceilometer', 'Documentation', > 'Infrastructure', 'QA' and 'Oslo'. 'Trove' and 'Ironic' are in > incubation. Those programs should retroactively submit a mission > statement and initial lead designation, if they don't have one already. > """
Oops. In this variant, Trove and Ironic, as programs, would not be "in incubation" (only one of their deliverables would). That last paragraph should be fixed as: """ The initial Programs are 'Nova', 'Swift', 'Cinder', 'Neutron', 'Horizon', 'Glance', 'Keystone', 'Heat', 'Ceilometer', 'Documentation', 'Infrastructure', 'QA', 'Oslo', 'Trove' and 'Ironic'. Those programs should retroactively submit a mission statement and initial lead designation, if they don't have one already. """ Maybe Ironic should be merged into the TripleO program when it's considered. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
