Mark McLoughlin wrote: > Oslo libraries and docs are very much on the same cadence - as in the > true meaning of the word, "rhythm". The fact that, for process reasons, > oslo libraries get released a little before the server releases and, for > pragmatic reasons, docs get released a little after the server releases > changes little in my mind - everyone's working in the same cycle to > produce a single, integrated OpenStack product.
I agree with that, although I'd remove the word "integrated" from the last sentence. The trick is, we now have a pretty strong definition of "integrated project" which is linked to what you call 'server projects', incubation and core. Overloading the term sounds like a bad idea to me. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
