If you were trying to have an open discussion, then you went about it quite wrong. Nothing was mentioned on this mailing list. I don't think anything was mentioned in the Open Source Meeting (which has of late become nothing more than a Snowglobe bug triage) and I don't see any transcripts on the wiki of any other office hours discussing it.
On Dec 12th Babbage Linden said "there are plans, but they are a long way off" So if you rely on hearsay to communicate your ideas, don't act surprised when they are misinterpreted. I don't mean to sound harsh, but from my viewpoint, there's nothing very "open" about SL Open Source anymore. Mike Kent Quirk (Q Linden) wrote: > This makes me sad. > > I've been trying to have an open discussion about some of the design > issues in my office hours, specifically to understand the constraints > and requirements of the community. But every office hour seems to be > followed up by flames on this list and in other forums interpreting what > was said in the worst possible way. > > I'm afraid the tone and direction of this discussion are making it > impossible for us to talk about this project productively. _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
