On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:57:52AM -0500, Kent Quirk (Q Linden) wrote: > This makes me sad. > > I've been trying to have an open discussion about some of the design issues in > my office hours, specifically to understand the constraints and requirements > of > the community. But every office hour seems to be followed up by flames on this > list and in other forums interpreting what was said in the worst possible way.
I don't have time to attend office hours at those exact moments. Not everyone lives in the States. > I'm afraid the tone and direction of this discussion are making it impossible > for us to talk about this project productively. Yeah right. I read the posts too, and they seem to be all true. This remark sounds like a poor excuse to explain why there is no open development of client-side scripting ON THIS LIST, where it belongs. I'm sorry, but I agree with the statement of Maggie that the only sane conclusion is that, as always seems to be the case, "it is being done in secret with the intention of maximizing spin control of reactions of the user community until such initiatives are fait accompli" LL is simply not willing nor interested to listen to the (open source) community; they want no discussion and want to push what they think is best. > Q -- Carlo Wood <ca...@alinoe.com> _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
