On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Xiaofan Chen <xiaof...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is a new development on the libusb 1.0 for Windows front now that
> libusb 1.0 already works under Linux and Mac OS X. Now the libusb-winusb
> branch reached beta status. This may be a good alternative to the libusb-win32
> project which has not moved for years.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/libusb-winusb-wip/
> http://libusb.org/wiki/windows_backend
>
> The benefits of this WinUSB backend is that it will work for 64bit Windows
> like Vista and Windows 7. The WinUSB backend will not support isochronous
> transfer, but that is not a problem for use with OpenOCD.
>
> libusb-winusb will be integrated to the main libusb-1.0 tree (using git). Once
> it is mature, I think it will be very good replacement for libusb-win32
> for libftdi and OpenOCD project.
>
> Interestingly, one of the tools the author (Pete) used for testing is OpenOCD
> with the FTDI based dongle. He is modifying libftdi to use his libusb-winusb
> and it seems that OpenOCD still works. I will give it a try later.
>
> Please try this branch if you are interested.

Success story with UrJtag. So it seems usable now (for XP and above, 32bit or
64bit Windows).
http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-libusb-1.0-for-Windows-%28libusb-winusb%29-now-beta---needs-testers-reviewers-p27145362.html


-- 
Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to