On Saturday 09 January 2010, David Brownell wrote: > Are there more issues that seem like they need attention before > we freeze 0.4.0 ?
For the record, the most significant items now left on my own list of stuff to do before freezing 0.4: - That NOR "flash erase_address pad addr length" feature. Patch written but needs testing. - Test arm920t cp15 access changes ... there was quite a lot of change there, possibly enough to cause regression on the only platform in the tree (csb337) using that code. - If I can verify it works properly on ARM9, merge the last bit of support for the reset-assert event: ARM7/ARM9 glue. That works fine for newer ARMs (Cortex-A8, ARM11), but most cores are older. (Completing mostly-merged work.) - Sanity testing with more boards, to make sure regressions didn't sneak in. Includes some NAND stuff. - Semihosting: try it out, provide basic docs. This is a pretty significant new feature, and I'd *REALLY* like to see some success reports ... - There are a few other bits of doc that seem to be missing, based on queries from the list. Notably, single stepping Cortex-M3 in the face of IRQs ... a typical task. I'm sure there are a few issues other folk have been carrying around. Please share! - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
