On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 02:31 -0800, David Brownell wrote: > On Friday 04 December 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > That's better. > > It's an ugly hack that's papering over some real bug. > > Why was the JTAG initialization bypassed? The stuff > that forces the equivalent of "jtag_reset 0 0" ?
I just pushed another workaround needed after your last fix, so try it again now. Does it still hurt when you run your tests? --Z _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
