On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 21:25 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 October 2009, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, David Brownell wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 28 October 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
> > > >
> > > >   Are we trying for 0.3.0, or not?!?
> > > 
> > > I was kind of expecting you to cut an RC some time ago;
> > > so I've been wondering the same thing ...
> > 
> > OK then.  What about cutting it _now_ ?
> 
> I'll count that as a vote for what I'll call a
> "modified Øyvind plan" ... 
> 
>  - Øyvind suggested Friday,
>  - I elaborated as 12:01am UTC Friday, which is
>    about 19.5 hours away, as I write.
> 
> That's quite close to "now", but still allows
> a little time for last minute panics and even
> some last-minute second thoughts and bugfixes.
> 
> 
> > Please make it 0.3.0-rc1 right away.  If something is really screwed and 
> > require a big patch then just merge the fix and call it -rc2.  
> > Otherwise let's ship 0.3.0 final in a week and accept small and only 
> > obvious bug fixes until then.
> 
> Yep, "modified Øyvind plan".  I'm all for it.
> 
> Let's call this the plan of record.  So if
> anyone objects, "speak now or forever hold
> your peas".
> 
> Doc updates are generally OK in this kind of
> window too; I have a few of those.
> 
> 
> So specifically ... we need names assigned to
> action items.  The tasks seem to be three:
> 
>   1 - Create and push a "v0.3.0-rc1" tag,
>       with associated configure.in update
>   2 - Create a tarball; test it; distribute
>       via the SF and Berlios download pages
>   3 - Send announcement
> 
> #1 and #3 are trivial.  And in fact, they
> suffice -- #2 can come later.  In the
> interests of moving things forward, I
> will sign up to perform those two trivial
> tasks at about 12:01 Friday, UTC.  (But
> if anyone else craves that duty, let me
> know!)
> 
> Courtesy of commits last night from Zach,
> I think #2 *should* be trivial; but I've
> not yet tried his scripts.  Also, only a
> limited number of folk can put tarballs
> onto the Berlios download page... the SF
> one is a bit more writable.  So I'm a bit
> inclined to leave #2 up to someone who
> can write to both sites.

I just tagged 0.3.0-rc0 and will post the packages shortly.

Cheers,

Zach
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to