> Is this for 0.3.0 or 0.4.0?  I have ~50 patches and at least one or two
> will probably have minor conflicts with yours.  I also am looking at
> doing a ton more cleanup like the stuff you have done, but I am waiting
> until a) we ship 0.3.0 and b) I get my current series in the tree.
> If I had continued, I'd probably have a stack of at least 200 by now, so
> there is no question about the opportunities to do this kind of work.
> The question is when we should merge them.


I would like to see:

- 0.3 out of the door. Shut down sf master for anything but
bugfixes as of friday 30. to wed 4.? Cut release nov 5.?
- that we can agree that major features are developed in public
branches on repo.or.cz and then applied to sf when they
are as ready as they are going to be. Communication can be
via the mailing list and explicit posts.

W.r.t. testing I believe that we have to push changes to sf master
before they are tested beyond the few developers working on
a particular feature branch.

How does that sound as a first tiny step towards improving our
process & getting 0.3 out of the door?


-- 
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to